News
Lemat Abogados (Lawyers) it has assumed the defense of the platform of affected by the company LibertaGia
According to the daily “A Grenadian Court is investigating a fraud that could affect 250.000 people. The contracted debt rises to a variable economic amount between 1.000 and 1.278 million euros. For the time being there are five hundred complaints lodged against the Portuguese company Libertagia”.
Antonio José García Cabrera, executive chairman of Lemat Abogados, has declared to the daily:
“Our law firm is centralizing all complaints, and the more, better, harder. We are receiving complaints from the United States, Angola, France, Russia, Italy, Colombia, Chile, China, among other countries, and from forty Spanish provinces. We have a website of Affected by Libertagia (www.afectadoslibertagia.com)."
LibertàGià Affected Platform
Usually in these cases, people who have invested their time and money are suspicious of anything and everybody. Accordingly, we have now an obligation to issue this release, whose main aim is to ensure the full independence of this law firm of any possible particular interests in this matter, by defending your case individually, with the objectives of identifying what is up with LibertàGià, attempting to obtain he money owed to all of you, and if a crime was committed, punishing the persons alleged to be responsible.
All of this, in compliance with the ethical rules of the lawyers' profession, which obligate the lawyers to “preserve their independence from outside pressures, requirements or complacency that restrict it, whether it be in respect of public authorities, economic or facto powers, courts, the client and even their own colleagues or collaborators”. Furthermore, the relationship between a lawyer and his client is based on trust, and this requires ethical professional conduct, that means, honest, loyal, truthful and diligent. Also, the lawyer is obliged not to abuse the trust of his client and not to defend interests in conflict with those of the client.
That is precisely what we want to ensure with the present release, just because Lemat Abogados S.L. is a company dedicated to law practice, headquartered in Granada (Spain), and subject to those rules, under disciplinary action.
Therefore, we want to reiterate our absolute independence from any interest other than the professional, and our intention to defend your interests individually, informing you directly, and formulating the claim taking into account the specific circumstances of the individual case.
Because of the complexity of the case and the existence of millions of affected on a world level, we ask trust and patience of all people who had joined the platform to the already initiated claim progresses.
For those who have not yet joined the Platform, we believe that it is appropriate to inform you we believe, due to the enquiries have been done so far, it is not possible LibertàGià keeps the promises it has given. For this reason, we ask you analyze criticality of the situation in order to make the decision that best suits your interests to avoid causing any further damage. However, we will be satisfied if following our intervention, LibertàGià begins to pay you back, although, frankly speaking, we believe that without a complaint procedure it will not be possible.
Finally, we certify that Lemat Abogados S.L. is the only holder of the bank account in which payment is made to be registered on the Platform, which can be found on the website www.afectadoslibertagia.com (domain which is owned by this firm); equally we certify that the amount of 51 euros requested is entirely intended to cover the legal fees of the lawyers of this firm and of the attorneys needed.
Granada, May 22, 2015
LEMAT ABOGADOS, S.L.
P.P. Antonio José García Cabrera
Lawyer-Partner and Legal Manager
LEMAT ABOGADOS, S.L., C/. Jesús y María, 16 18009 GRANADA (SPAIN) C.I.F. B-18901413
Lemat Abogados (Lawyers) it has assumed the defense of the platform of affected by the company LibertaGia
" Lemat Abogados (Lawyers) it has assumed the defense of the platform of affected by the company LibertaGia to which it is accused of lack of payment of what might suppose " a supposed fraud that operates under a pyramidal system " as the claimants affirm. Lemat Abogados (Lawyers) it has called on in order that there stick fast all the persons who could feel harmed in this demand that might reach the number of 250.000 affected ones in Spain and approximately two millions and way in the world.
ADMINISTRATORS LIABILITY FOR COMPANY’S DEBTS
It is increasingly common in this times that in a situation of loss by a corporation, the administrator can be liable for any debts with her/his own personal wealth. The Companies Law (RDLeg 1/2010) provides in Article 363 the obligation to dissolve the company in a number of cases.
However, in this article we look at cases where losses reduce net worth less than half of the share capital unless such capital is increased or reduced to a sufficient extent, and not from the bankruptcy.
To avoid liability in social debts , the following measures shall be taken: increase, or decrease, the share capital to the necessary extent.convene within two months, since the administrator is aware of the aforementioned situation, to a General Board meeting in order to dissolve the company and, ultimately, encourage judicial dissolution or, if necessary, to declare the state of insolvency within two months from the scheduled date of the General Meeting, when it had not taken place, or from the date in which the Board did not approve the dissolution.
The fact that the manager does not take any of these measures may involve the exercise of social liability action and, therefore, the administrator will be liable for the debts from this personal assets, and to remember that the Law of Corporations presumes that the administrator is aware of the financial and economic (annual and quarterly minimum) states. In short, it is essential that corporate managers are very attentive today due to the consequences they may suffer in their own heritage.
Miguel Olmedo Zafra
Law Department
LEMAT ABOGADOS
FATAL ACCIDENT ON THE A-44
The Criminal Court No. 2 in Granada held the trial of a 27 year old man that was driving the car that allegedly caused an accident on the A-44 in which a man died and three others were injured in January 2010. The prosecution accused Manuel Santiago HC, who had a positive result in breath tests, of the offense of reckless homicide, two injuries and other dangerous driving. The prosecutor requested a sentence of 3 years and 9 months in prison while the prosecution exercised by counsel Manuel Ocaña, signature Lemat Attorneys, raised its request up to 4 years and 6 months. The defense, meanwhile, called for the acquittal of the accused or, alternatively, a fine or three months in prison. The accident happened just after six o'clock of Saturday January 23, 2010 in the A-44, meaning Motril, at 137,800 km, just before the output Otura-La Malahá, when four employees of a company selling construction materials were on their way to work in a van when they were collided by the car driven by the defendant, who was trying to overtake. The van was projected toward the right side of the road. Skidded, it left the road and crashed into the perimeter fence of the highway to finally dump on his left side falling to the service road. Following the accident, a twenty-two year-old from Cenes de la Vega who occupied the rear of the van died; Two of the occupants were seriously injured and the other mild. The defendant explained that night was spent at a friend's house playing video game and that he only drank beer. At six o'clock he took his car to go to his home in El Padula, and the accident occurred, according to his version, when the van made somethingh " strange" at the time he was going to overpass it. "I could not do anything and barely remember anything else. He was scared and nervous, "he remarked, before reiterating that he was able to drive and was going about 100 km / h. The occupants of the van said they always wore a seat belt safety. "It was a sacred rule of the company, 'said co-pilot that day. Also denied that the van will make a strange or invaded the left wing. Impact on violence, one witness defined it as if they had reached "a missile".
Print confirmed
Civilian guards rushed to the scene ensured that the accused seemed to be drunk. This was confirmed after breath tests. The first, performed at 7:00, gave 0.67 mg. per liter of air, almost triple the maximum allowed (0.25 mg.). Twenty minutes later, the rate was reduced to 0.62 mg. Agents categorically rejected the possibility of the rate of alcohol with only two beers and also ingested seven hours before the test. Regardless of the test, the defendant had "slurred speech, glossy eyes, tired appearance and odor of alcohol." Also expressed doubt that the van has done “something strange” or changed lanes because "everything happened in the right lane," said one of them. The two noted that the deceased, who was thrown through a window of the van, was not wearing a seat belt fastened and expressed doubts about the mechanism malfunctions. The trial was seen for sentencing.
Sea more at: Ideal.es